His requirements for a PLE Framework include:
- Social features
- Social filtering
- Incorporate various Web 2.0 concepts and technologies (mashups, widgets, aggregation, OpenID, RSS, etc.)
- Flexibility and extensibility
- Web browser platform
- Ease of use
- The concept of a Personal Learning Environment (PLE) exists, but actual PLEs only exist as theoretical combinations of skills, methods and tools. The concept of a Personal Learning Environment Framework gets it even farther from some actual system. There will be Social Network Operating Systems that will allow us to pull together our highly personal environment. But, too much structure is not going to work.
- I mentioned quite a while ago (in Personal Work and Learning Environments (PWLE) - More Discussion and Personal Work and Learning Environments) that:
Knowledge work is not separate from learning.Yes, there are times that Knowledge Workers will step away from day-to-day activities to go do developmental learning activities that may not be directly related to their day-to-day knowledge work. But that's the exception. In almost all cases work and learning is inseparable.
To me, it does not make sense to look at using one environment (an LMS or PLE) as part of learning and another environment as part of knowledge work.
That's the reason I call these:
Personal Work and Learning Environment (PWLE - pronounce p-whale)And there's only one for me. It's the set of methods, skills, tools that I use to perform my day-to-day knowledge work activities where I acquire information, knowledge, etc.
Luckily all of the requirements that Mohamed cites apply equally well to a PWLE.
I'm curious if anyone actually sees this different? Do we gain something by separating them?
If we are going to make progress with Corporate Learning Long Tail and Attention Crisis, I think we have to think about these things in an integrated fashion.