Tony Karrer's eLearning Blog on e-Learning Trends eLearning 2.0 Personal Learning Informal Learning eLearning Design Authoring Tools Rapid e-Learning Tools Blended e-Learning e-Learning Tools Learning Management Systems (LMS) e-Learning ROI and Metrics

Thursday, May 25, 2006

Shift in eLearning from Pure Courseware towards Reference Hybrids

Just when you've made the transition from the prior generation of CBT authoring tools (e.g., Authorware, Toolbook) to the new generation of WBT authoring tools (e.g., Captivate, Lectora), it looks like things are slowly shifting again.
The shift I'm seeing is away from the design of pure "courseware" solutions
and much more to "reference hybrid" solutions.

To explain this, I need to step back and deal with the fact that terminology around eLearning Patterns is problematic.

In my mind, "courseware" is interactive (to some level) instruction run asynchronously. It is created via an Authoring Tool or an Learning Content Management System. Often there's period quizzing to test understanding. It's designed to hit particular instructional objectives. It's the stuff you see demonstrated at every Training conference over the past ten years. Oh, and it almost definitely has a NEXT BUTTON.

"Reference" is static content - meaning no interaction other than allowing the user to link from page-to-page and to search. It is asynchronous. It is normally a series of web pages, but can be PDF or other document types. It can be created using Wiki software, a content management system, web editing software or even Microsoft Word stored as HTML. It's designed to provide either real-time support for work tasks or near real-time support for look up. Often they are designed based around particular job functions and tasks to provide good on-the-job support. It almost certainly does not have a next button and should have search. You probably don't see many demonstrations of these kinds of solutions, because they aren't sexy.

I realize that these terms are vague, so let me go see what other people have to say. If you look at various eLearning Glossaries: Wikipedia eLearning Glossary, WorldWideLearn eLearning Glossary, Cybermedia Creations eLearning Glossary, you'll find that there are hopeless definitions of "courseware" and no definition of "reference." Reference sometimes comes out as "job aids" or "online support" or "online help" or various other things. Each of these other terms in slightly more specific than "reference" as they generally imply a bit more about the specific structure of the content. Thus, "reference" to me is a good umbrella term.

By the way, if you can help me ... Am I missing an alterative term for "reference?" Are we just calling these "web pages?"

I did try another avenue to find better definitions. I went over to Brandon Hall's Awards Site. He has awards for "custom content" organized by the type of function they were supporting, e.g., sales. I would think that "content" is an inclusive term for courseware and reference. However, if you look at the judging criteria the first question is: "How engaging is this entry?" So, I've got to assume they really are looking for courseware and not for reference material (which is inherently less engaging - and in fact you would claim that you don't want it to be engaging, you want it to be quick and to the point).

The other categories for Learning Technology. The sub-categories here are:

  • Course Development Tools
  • Software and System Simulation Development Tools
  • Soft Skills and Technical Simulation Development Tools
  • Tests or Instructional Games Creation Tools
  • Rapid Content Creation Tools
  • Live E-Learning/Virtual Classroom Technology
  • Just-in-Time Learning Technology
  • Innovations in Learner Management Technology
  • Innovations in Learning Content Creation and Learning Content Management Technology
  • Open

None of this makes me think about "reference," but maybe it would be included in either "Rapid Content Creation" or "Just-in-Time."

Okay, now that I'm done ranting about terminology, here's the real point ...

We are seeing a significant shift in development away from mostly creating courseware to creating more-and-more reference materials designed to be just-in-time support.

Even more so, we are seeing a shift towards Hybrid Reference and Courseware combinations where the Courseware is embedded within the Reference. So, if you don't quite understand the concept or you want to make sure you provide a nice introduction, you put that embedded within the web pages.

As an example of this, we've created several hybrid reference/courseware solutions that are designed to both introduce and support the use of software. Traditionally, we would have built courses in something like Captivate and pointed users to go take these courses first. We would have separately created a "support" site that would have a FAQ and help on various tasks.

In the hybrid solution, we created the support site as the first element you go to and put a prominent "First Time User" link on the home page. This page takes them to instructions on how to get up and going. Most of the content is presented as static web pages that tell how to perform particular tasks, but some of the pages contain embedded Captivate movies to demonstrate or simulate use of the system.

This design has given us several advantages:
  • End-users can get started with the application quickly and receive incremental help on the use of the system as they need it. We've eliminated most up-front training.
  • End-users only see one solution that provides "help on using the application" as opposed to seeing "training" and "support" separately.
  • It costs less to produce because there's greater content sharing between training and support materials and because we build more of the content as reference which costs less.

I'll be curious to hear if other people are seeing a similar shift in what they are building.



Keywords: eLearning Trends, eLearning Resources

9 comments:

rlubensky said...

Several points:
1. Courseware is dead. Long live nuggets, or as you write, references for learning.
2. Don't confuse the tool with the product it can create. Whether Authorware, Flash or Toolbook, you can use it to create nuggets, and I think you should. No next button.
3. Upfront system "training" is usually a waste of time (I know, I've built dozens of packages). But upfront introduction, new language setting, context setting, even promotion as part of a change management strategy is vital.

mreedy29 said...

I am not sure courseware is dead, yet anyways. There appear to be an awful lot of my clients that still want event learning, and this requires courseware.

I am seeing this trend towards utilizing refernece and simulations to modularize or chunk out learning topics. I have actually combined the learning and support efforts for a client and found them to be quite effective. The online help was the place to be if yo uwanted to learn how to perform a task in the new system.

I also must disagree with the upfront system training is a waste of time by the first post. I feel it depends on the client and the culture of the organization. We are still transitioning from companies and organizations that are event based training to becoming true learning organizations in which employees seek out the answers to their questions.

Tony Karrer said...

Combining learning and support definitely seems like a trend. The balance of up-front vs. as-needed training is an interesting question - and I have definitely seen a reduction in the length of up-front training.

Even though our level of comment is different, it's interesting that we roughly are seeing the same trend.

Mark Berthelemy said...

Coming late to this party - but I agree totally with Tony. We're seeing a lot more call for solutions that need simple (usually open-source) content management systems as their basis. These systems contain often hundreds of pages of content, with the aim being that learners can quickly find what they need.

You can also use systems like these to link to content packages (like Articulate presentations etc) - just as you'd link to a Word doc or PDF. The only problem with this approach is that the content then sits outside of the CMS database and then cannot be searched easily (unless you go for a high-end search engine as well).

For a long time now, I've been on the look out for a system (preferably open-source) that fits your description of the new kind of LMS. A system that allows content to be added, edited and organised - whilst offering support functions, forums etc.

Moodle is great at the support bit, but dreadful at organising content so that learners can find it easily. CMS's are great at the content bit (except for content packages) but not so good at the support bit.

Sreya said...

I'm coming really really late to this post but could not help writing up my own perspective and solution based on some relevant experiences that I could relate to while reading this post and related links on Rapid elearning. Tony and others, I would be glad if you could read my post Pure courseware vs Reference Hybrids

Thanks,
Sreya

Mark said...

Funny how things come full circle.

For years, developers have fallen in love with the pretty deliverables, while functional managers have been left with performance metrics for their staff.

Remember Gloria Gery? She championed "electronic performace support systems" back in '91 that sound a lot like "reference" to me today. Hooray for her!

As a career development manager as well as a functional manager, I've never swooned over gimmickery nor simple quizzing technology that gives the look of performance improvement. Great for trade shows, but...

Not to say traditional courseware (whatever THAT is) doesn't have it's place, but I still remember how laserdisc authoring was going to put all of us out of business. Instead, I feel just-in-time tools and coaching are the unsung heroes of performance improvement.

mithunchetan said...

You can also use systems like these to link to content packages (like Articulate presentations etc) - just as you'd link to a Word doc or PDF. The only problem with this approach is that the content then sits outside of the CMS database and then cannot be searched easily (unless you go for a high-end search engine as well).

You want to know about online degree psychology

Anonymous said...

Shouldn't the form of the instructional materials be determined by the instructional activities and learning objectives they support?

ryan2point0 said...

Tony, this is such a great example of "informal first" (http://wp.me/pf1R0-2cn).

And I see you wrote it way back in 2006!