Tony Karrer's eLearning Blog on e-Learning Trends eLearning 2.0 Personal Learning Informal Learning eLearning Design Authoring Tools Rapid e-Learning Tools Blended e-Learning e-Learning Tools Learning Management Systems (LMS) e-Learning ROI and Metrics

Tuesday, April 21, 2009

Good Posts from Last Week

While there is a little bit of controversy about posting these lists, I'm continuing to use the capability of using social signals to make sure I'm finding good stuff. So here's what came up via eLearning Learning from last week. But I'm keeping it to a bare minimum. And I must say that these are pretty good - it would be a shame if you missed them.

Top Posts

The following are the top posts from featured sources based on social signals.

  1. Twitter Job Aid - work in progress- Adventures in Corporate Education, April 12, 2009
  2. Reduce Searching Start Talking- eLearning Technology, April 14, 2009
  3. Solve problems with screencasting- eLearning Acupuncture, April 14, 2009
  4. Augmented Reality in Learning- Upside Learning Blog, April 15, 2009

Top Other Items

The following are the top other items based on social signals.

  1. Determining the ROI of Enterprise 2.0 | Enterprise Web 2.0 | ZDNet.com, April 15, 2009
  2. The Web: Design for Active Learning, April 17, 2009
  3. The (changed) information cycle, April 17, 2009
  4. 3 Things to Consider When Building Your E-Learning Courses, April 14, 2009
  5. Effective knowledge sharing, April 15, 2009
  6. conversation matters: What Do We Get From Conversation That We Can't Get Any Other Way?, April 14, 2009

Top Keywords

Conversation on Conversations

Through blog comments and blog posts, an interesting conversation is emerging around – Conversations as Part of Concept Work.   It somewhat started with my post Reduce Searching Start Talking where I suggest that there are points in our concept work where we need to be ready to move from search to conversation.  In the comments there …

Maria H tells us - I think there is time and purpose for all types of information transfer (for lack of a better phrase) and helping people learn when to use the right one is our challenge.

Ken Allan really somewhat crystallizes it as a question of "Knowing WHEN to switch?"  Or more broadly, when is each kind of method appropriate given a specific concept work need.

In Conversation Questions, I pushed this a bit further based on Nancy Dixon - What Do We Get From Conversation That We Can't Get Any Other Way? – looking at the areas of value, but also left it with the challenging question of not only knowing when to switch, but also knowing who to ask and how to ask the right questions.

In Love the Conversation – Ken Allan discusses the complexity of helping concept workers with the skills around this:

The question here is where to start. It is likely too complex for a practical guiding taxonomy to be drawn up and be of any use. Drafting a program to teach adults to use the right means of knowledge transfer is probably at least as difficult as teaching children to be discerning about information accessible on the Internet. There are no hard and fast rules for this. Yet there is no doubt that discernment forms a large part of selecting efficient and effective means for knowledge transfer.

While this is complex, it's very important.  There are very specific limits to using codified knowledge and that Conversation Learning is essential.  Unfortunately, I'm not sure that we really are doing much to address this important Knowledge Worker Skill Gap

What's nice is that Ken has helped me to get to these core questions:

  • When
  • Who
  • How

Part of the Who and How question, we've discussed before in the Big Question – Network Feedback – where we discussed different places to reach out for help from your networks.  There was certainly no clear answer and some suggestion that we should be aggressive about reaching out to many of your networks.  I've also discussed it in I've talked about it in Leveraging Networks Skill and Networks and Communities.

Codified Conversations

Separately, Harold Jarche provided some interesting thoughts around issues of codified knowledge, individuals and conversations.  He reminded me of Dave Pollard experience with knowledge management (and it's a conversation I've had directly with Dave):

So my conclusion this time around was that the centralized stuff we spent so much time and money maintaining was simply not very useful to most practitioners. The practitioners I talked to about PPI [Personal Productivity Improvement] said they would love to participate in PPI coaching, provided it was focused on the content on their own desktops and hard drives, and not the stuff in the central repositories.

Dave basically went through a transition from looking at KM as big central codified knowledge bases to going out to individuals and work teams in the organization to figure out how they could be helped on a tactical level. 

Dave provides a very interesting picture of information flows in 2025.

PollardOrgInfoFlows2

While his focus still seems to be more on codified knowledge, look at what his first item is: conversations.  There is, of course, a really interesting question of how that conversation is captured.  Dave certainly looks at that in his post – the scattered electronic conversation that occurs today.

Monday, April 20, 2009

Social Experience

Interesting image from post by Dave White – Eventedness that relates to our social experience with different tools.

eventednessonitsownnewsmall

It looks at how each technology relates to feeling of being present with others and whether that presence is felt beyond a specific limit of an event.

Co-presence comes from being embodied as avatars this definition includes what is experienced when an individual is certain that their contribution (usually in text form) will be read and responded to by others. For example it is possible to get a strong sense of the presence of others when microblogging because the exchanges are often frequent, they often reference each other and the response time can be a matter of seconds. Messages are linked to the particular point in time and their value erodes over time. There is a relationship between the speed in which the value of nodes of communication erode within a technology and the potential for Co-presence. In addition the individuals’ level of trust that their contribution will be understood and responded to within a particular technology has a large bearing on both Co-presence and Eventedness. It is of note that there is very little latent social presence in MUVEs. When you log-off your presence all but evaporates leaving almost no trace of your identity or that fact that you were in the MUVE.

He also points out something quite interesting that I had not really considered the same way is that part of the value of social networking sites and microblogging is that you feel connected to the person even though they are not real-time online at that point. In other words, the social experience extends beyond the specific event.

I'm not 100% sure I fully grasp the implications and meanings of the terms he uses and their importance to the social experience. But, I think the part that really is interesting here is better captured in his post - That Was an Interesting Experience -

“Teaching and learning in virtual worlds is an experience.”

Taking part of a teaching session in a Multiuser Virtual Environment (MUVE) is more than simply using a tool or achieving a task, it feels like an event, a particular moment in time when you have the chance to interact with others at a level of intensity which is rarely felt in other online spaces.

There is definitely something different about "getting together" with other people and the social experience using these different tools. How much you feel connected to them varies greatly.

Pictures and Connection

I need to do a full post on this, but I receive quite a few LinkedIn Connection requests - My LinkedIn Open Connection Approach – and it's surprising how often I will get them from people who briefly met me somewhere and they don't have a picture on their profile. That's really a bad move from a social experience standpoint:

  • I have trouble associating names with faces and you are making it really hard to remember you.
  • It says - "I'm not serious" – and makes it less likely that I will connect with you.
  • Most importantly, it hurts the effect that Dave White is describing – the connection. Without that picture I simply won't feel as connected to you.

But it's also surprising to me that we don't use pictures elsewhere. Way back in Ten Predictions for eLearning 2008, I predicted

Virtual Classroom Tools - Meeting Tool + Second Life Lite

A medium size Virtual Classroom / Meeting Tool will announce features in 2008 that are not 3D immersive, but that are more like Mii characters in a 2.5D world. This will allow more natural kinds of interactions in classroom settings, especially for things like breakout activities.

I got this horribly wrong in that it hasn't happened, but I still think that this will happen. As I look at Dave White's posts, I believe this is an important fundamental part of the social experience that should be happening.

When I watch how my kids play with games, if there's an avatar tool, they often fail to ever play the game because they run out of time having spent so much time creating a good avatar. Yesterday, I was at a bowling alley / arcade and several of the games at an arcade had customizing my ride kids of features. Why? Because it makes us feel more connected to the experience? It goes from a game to a social experience.

Why the heck doesn't each tool – WebEx, Adobe Connect, Elluminate, etc. ask for a bit more profile information in order to try to make it have a better social experience? A picture and a link to their LinkedIn profile (or other profile page)? Sure the pictures would be hard to fit in the tiny space, but I guarantee you would feel more connected. Heck – on most blogs that show who are recent visitors, they don't show a list of text names. They show a list of pictures.

These tools also should have a view that gives you a 2.5D representation of what's going on. They should allow a natural placement breakout into rooms.

These tools should hire some Mac designers to create something that's not 3D, but that gives a greater feeling of presence.

In the meantime, I think it's likely up to us to define how we can use the existing capabilities in ways that make it a better social experience. I cannot claim to be good at this myself, but I want to thank Dave for reminding me of the importance of social experience.

I'd very much welcome thoughts on this.

Sunday, April 19, 2009

24 Hour Conversation on Learning in Organizations - Free

I'm not quite sure what Jay was thinking when he decided to do this, but I'm curious to see what happens.  He's pulled together a 24 Hour Continuous Learning Event:

Conversations about Learning in Organizations

He's got folks from around the world who are going to help participate over the course of 24 hours.  Here's the FAQ.

He's pulled in quite a few people who's names you will know:

  • Marcia Conner
  • Connie Green
  • Stuart Henshall
  • Michelle Lentz
  • Christopher Peri
  • Harold Jarche
  • Clark Quinn
  • Nancy White
  • Rob Paterson
  • Mark Sylvester
  • Ellen Wagner
  • Curt Bonk
  • Charles Jennings
  • Jon Husband
  • Dave Wilkins
  • Brent Schlenker
  • Barry Shields
  • George Siemens
  • Luis Suarez

and many more. 

They will be discussing topics that include:

  • Learning in an era of networked intelligence
  • Show me the money: examples of the payback of social/networked learning
  • New roles for learning professionals
  • Changing corporate culture to accommodate the new learning
  • Making informal learning concrete
  • Twitter and the march toward real-time learning
  • How can we get learners to take responsibility for their own learning?
  • CGI: Bringing the internet inside for informal learning & transformation
  • Case examples of informal learning in corporations.
  • Measuring the results of informal learning
  • Personal learning environments: you show me yours, I'll show you mine

and more.

Friday, April 17, 2009

Valuable Content - Views and Social Signals

I just saw two posts by a couple of the nicest people out there:
Both posts look at page views of posts and use that as a proxy for what is good / interesting / valuable.

I've talked about the questionable nature of page views vs. other signals in posts such as: An Aha Moment - del.icio.us as Indicator of Valuable Content - Importantly My Content

Since my aha moment, I've always been skeptical of using page views. However, I've also come to realize that there are some limits with each different kind of social signal (e.g., delicious links, click throughs, page views, time on page, etc.).

Because both Nancy and Bill contribute to the Communities and Networks Connection and both have the keyword widget installed, I was able to see ...

Nancy's top ten posts for Q1 according to various social signals were:
  1. Tom Vander Wall Nails My Sharepoint Experience- Full Circle, March 23, 2009
  2. CoP Series #6: Community Leadership in Learning- Full Circle, March 10, 2009
  3. Twitter as Search Engine or Community Seed- Full Circle, March 6, 2009
  4. CoP Series #5: Is my community a community of practice?- Full Circle, March 5, 2009
  5. CoP Series #4: Practice Makes Perfect- Full Circle, March 3, 2009
  6. CoP Series #9: Community Heartbeats- Full Circle, March 19, 2009
  7. CoP Series #8: Content and Community- Full Circle, March 17, 2009
  8. Tinkering and Playing with Knowledge- Full Circle, March 8, 2009
  9. A humorous presentation of Blogs vs. Wikis- Full Circle, January 12, 2009
  10. Red-Tails in Love: Birdwatchers as a community of practice- Full Circle, March 26, 2009
Bill's top ten posts for Q1 according to various social signals were:
  1. Ten Ways to Track Your Online Reputation- Portals and KM, January 27, 2009
  2. Enterprise 2.0 for an Enterprise of One – Part Two - Content Monitoring- Portals and KM, March 10, 2009
  3. McKinsey on Making Enterprise 2.0 Work is Reminder of Process Centric KM in Early 90s. - Portals and KM, March 18, 2009
  4. Enterprise 2.0 for an Enterprise of One – Part Four - Content Collecting, Assembling, and Creation – Potential New Approaches - Portals and KM, March 12, 2009
  5. Enterprise 2.0 for an Enterprise of One – Introduction- Portals and KM, March 9, 2009
  6. Enterprise 2.0 for an Enterprise of One – Part Five - Content Publishing and Archiving- Portals and KM, March 13, 2009
  7. Enterprise 2.0 for an Enterprise of One – Part Three - Content Collecting, Assembling, and Creation – Current Approach- Portals and KM, March 11, 2009
  8. Business Blogs Trump Social Networking Sites as New Business Drivers - Portals and KM, March 4, 2009
  9. Central Desktop Using Twitter for Sales, Service, and Brand Monitoring Conversations- Portals and KM, February 23, 2009
  10. Knowledge Management Twitterers- Portals and KM, March 31, 2009
While there is overlap with the most viewed, I think that the above lists represent a more accurate picture of what users found valuable.